For Christmas I received an interesting present from a good friend - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was totally written by AI, with a few basic triggers about me supplied by my buddy Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, bphomesteading.com and utahsyardsale.com is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of writing, but it's likewise a bit repeated, sitiosecuador.com and very verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet's triggers in collecting information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the chief executive Adir Mashiach, forum.altaycoins.com based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, since rotating from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can order any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone developing one in anybody's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and created "solely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach worries that the product is intended as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold further.

He wants to broaden his range, creating various categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps providing an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human customers.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are talking about data here, we actually mean human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is images. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for innovative purposes must be prohibited, however I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without authorization should be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very effective however let's construct it ethically and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have chosen to block AI designers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have actually chosen to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to use developers' content on the internet to assist develop their models, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise strongly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of delight," says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening among its best performing markets on the unclear promise of growth."

A federal government spokesperson said: "No move will be made till we are definitely positive we have a useful plan that provides each of our objectives: increased control for ideal holders to assist them license their material, access to high-quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI plan, a national data library consisting of public data from a large range of sources will also be made offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to increase the security of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector needed to share information of the operations of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is stated to want the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a number of suits against AI firms, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been gotten by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the web without their permission, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of factors which can make up reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it gathers training data and whether it should be paying for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector pipewiki.org over the past week. It became one of the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its innovation for a fraction of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has lots of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and forum.batman.gainedge.org it can be quite tough to read in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But offered how quickly the tech is progressing, I'm not sure how long I can remain positive that my substantially slower human writing and modifying abilities, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in international technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.